The Ark
SUBSCRIBE
The Ark
SUBSCRIBE

Brig claims Belvedere council broke law during Mallard Pointe hearing

A Belvedere group fighting the 40-unit redevelopment of Mallard Pointe is accusing the City Council of breaking the law when it ruled the...

Kevin Hessel
By KEVIN HESSEL · 2 min read

A Belvedere group fighting the 40-unit redevelopment of Mallard Pointe is accusing the City Council of breaking the law when it ruled the landowner has a legal right to build apartments, despite local zoning that otherwise bans them on the lagoon-front site.

A Feb. 15 letter from Belvedere Residents for Intelligent Growth’s lawyer, San Francisco-based land-use and environmental attorney Mark Wolfe, gave the city 30 days to “cure and correct” the alleged violation of California’s open-meetings law, the Ralph M. Brown Act, or face a lawsuit seeking court invalidation.

 “The city disagrees with Brig’s allegation,” City Manager Robert Zadnik said Feb. 22, setting up a potential showdown. He added that Belvedere will provide Brig with its written response by the deadline but declined to elaborate further on the city’s position.

Wolfe, along with Brig co-chairs Jon Hansen of Santa Rosa and Tom Price of Belvedere, also declined further comment.

The allegation stems from an intermingling of rules that address some of Brig’s objections to the project, which would demolish 22 units of Mallard Road duplexes between the Belvedere Lagoon and City Hall. The latest version of the plan made public last week would replace them with six single-family homes and an accessory dwelling unit, four duplexes, one fourplex, two triplexes and a 15-unit apartment building. If the project’s approved, the owner plans to add two more second units at the houses by right for 42 units overall.

Brig says the city is misreading a state housing law about its obligations to allow the proposed apartments, while saying the entire project, including any apartments, poses significant environmental risks.

The latter has been the subject of two public hearings on whether the project qualifies for an urban-infill exemption from further study under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Read the complete story in our e-edition, or SUBSCRIBE NOW for home delivery and access to the digital replica.

A version of this story appeared in the Feb. 28, 2024, print edition of The Ark. See something wrong? Request a correction.
Recent Stories
Tiburon, Belvedere brace for El Niño, king tides Tiburon, Belvedere, Strawberry voters are weighing eight local contests, four local measures Nine-townhome plan for Point Tiburon clears key hurdle after three rejections Tiburon sailor’s America’s Cup campaign reaches the big screen Reed Union schools to develop age-based framework for screens, AI
In print every Wednesday
Front page of The Ark, Wednesday, October 28 Oct. 28, 2026 E-EDITION
The Ark in your inbox

Local news from Tiburon, Belvedere and Strawberry, delivered by email.

Support The Ark’s commitment to high-impact community journalism.

The Ark, named the nation's best small community weekly for 2026, is dedicated to delivering investigative, accountability journalism with a mission to increase civic engagement and participation by providing the knowledge that can help sculpt the community and change lives. Your support makes this possible.

SUBSCRIBE Make a contribution